From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Long v. Schenectady County Young Men's Christian Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 1996
227 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 9, 1996

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board.


During the summer of 1989, Karen C. Long participated in a counselor aide training program sponsored by the Schenectady County Young Men's Christian Association (hereinafter YMCA) at Camp Chingachgook in Warren County. She was injured while helping to launch a large raft. Long subsequently commenced a personal injury action against the YMCA. The YMCA interposed workers' compensation as an affirmative defense to the action, which led to proceedings before the Workers' Compensation Board. After various hearings, the Board issued a decision ruling that Long was an employee of the YMCA and that her injury was an accident within the meaning of the Workers' Compensation Law. Claimants appeal from this decision.

Initially, the existence of an employer-employee relationship is a factual matter for the Board to decide which must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Savino v UTOG 2-Way Radio, 215 A.D.2d 964; Matter of Le Fevre v. Tel-A-Car of N.Y., 198 A.D.2d 658). While no one factor is dispositive, the factors relevant to the Board's analysis include (1) the right of control over the claimant's work, (2) the method of payment, (3) the furnishing of equipment, (4) the right of discharge, and (5) the relative nature of the work ( see, Matter of Baker v. Wessel Duval, Inc., 194 A.D.2d 1047; Matter of Weingarten v. XYZ Two Way Radio Serv., 183 A.D.2d 964, lv dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 924).

In the case at bar, evidence was adduced at the hearing that Long received a reduction in tuition to attend the camp and free room and board in exchange for her participation in the counselor aide training program. Her duties included helping the counselors with classes and supervising the campers, with whom she shared a cabin. In addition, she was required to and did obtain working papers to participate in the program. Furthermore, the YMCA retained the right to ask Long to leave the camp if her conduct became undesirable and also provided her with all necessary equipment. In view of the foregoing, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision that Long was an employee of the YMCA.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Claim of Long v. Schenectady County Young Men's Christian Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 1996
227 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Claim of Long v. Schenectady County Young Men's Christian Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GARY N. LONG et al., as Parents and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 9, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 96

Citing Cases

Mauro v. Cross

rom the charitable organization in exchange for her volunteer activity. Although the record reflects that the…

Matter of Fitzpatrick v. Holimont, Inc.

Claimant appeals. Whether an employer-employee relationship exists is a factual matter for the Board to…