From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Motors Corp. v. Finance Administrator

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1979
70 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

June 26, 1979


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 17, 1977, in New York City real property tax certiorari proceedings reducing assessments on petitioner's property for the tax years 1966-1967 to 1975-1976, both inclusive, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs to respondents-appellants, and the petitions are dismissed and the assessments as finally determined by respondents-appellants are reinstated and confirmed. There is a presumption of validity of the assessments by the taxing authorities. (Matter of Peterson v. Board of Assessors of Town of Westport, 25 A.D.2d 797, 798.) Petitioner has the burden of showing by substantial evidence that the assessments were excessive. (Matter of Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Tax Comm. of City of N.Y., 31 A.D.2d 606, affd 28 N.Y.2d 514; Matter of Clairdale Enterprises v. Tax Comm. of City of N Y, 33 A.D.2d 543; Matter of Campagna v. Tax Comm. of City of N Y, 27 A.D.2d 832.) Petitioner has failed to meet that burden. The property involved is the General Motors Building occupying an entire block between 58th Street to 59th Street from Fifth Avenue to Madison Avenue, in the Borough of Manhattan, in the City of New York. The building was constructed in 1968. At least as to those tax years soon after acquisition of land and construction "The price paid by the petitioner * * * for the site of the building furnishes cogent evidence of land value, although by no means conclusive. * * * And, where, as here, we have a modern type building, newly constructed, the cost of construction thereof is `a highly significant indicator of value' of the building." (Matter of Pepsi-Cola Co. v. Tax Comm. of City of N.Y., 19 A.D.2d 56, 59; see, also, Matter of 5 East 71st St. v Boyland, 7 N.Y.2d 859, 861; Matter of Seagram Sons v. Tax Comm. of City of N.Y., 18 A.D.2d 109, 114, affd 14 N.Y.2d 314.) The assessments here are less than the cost of acquisition of the land (notwithstanding evidence of increased land values since acquisition), and the cost of construction of the building. They are also supported by the amount of the mortgage loan on the leasehold alone, and by rental values and comparable sales of land, and by reasonable capitalization of income.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Bloom, Markewich, Silverman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

General Motors Corp. v. Finance Administrator

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 26, 1979
70 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

General Motors Corp. v. Finance Administrator

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Respondent, v. FINANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 26, 1979

Citations

70 A.D.2d 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Trinity Place v. Fin Admin

Nevertheless, in the view we take in this case, we think we are able to decide the case without sending it…

Matter of Rock-Time v. Finance Administrator

15 million for the years in question. These assessments are presumed to be valid. Petitioner has the burden…