From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fromson v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1991
178 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 9, 1991


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

As one of Rockland County's pistol licensing officers, the respondent has broad discretion in ruling on permit applications, which he may deny for any good cause (Penal Law § 400.00; Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 A.D.2d 885). In the instant case the petitioner's license was initially suspended because of criminal charges filed against him by his wife, which were later dropped. At the time of the hearing on the petitioner's application for reinstatement, it appears that the parties were still embroiled in what the respondent termed an acrimonious divorce, and that the petitioner's wife expressed some concern for her safety. Under these circumstances, the respondent's determination to deny the petitioner's application for reinstatement of his pistol permit until the divorce was final did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Bracken, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Fromson v. Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1991
178 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Fromson v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVE FROMSON, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM NELSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

Aron v. Becker

N.Y. Penal Law §§ 265.20(3) (referencing sections 400.00 and 400.01).”).A licensing officer ... has broad…

Parker v. Randall

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination denying his pistol…