From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 29, 1966
220 N.E.2d 810 (N.Y. 1966)

Opinion

Argued September 20, 1966

Decided September 29, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Bernard F. Farley and Joseph M. Soviero for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( David Belson, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Matthew J. Sherlock, Jr., for claimant-respondent.


Order affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs. (See, also, Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hosp., 259 N.Y. 137; Matter of Stern v. Electrol, Inc., 4 A.D.2d 110, mot. for lv. to app. den. 3 N.Y.2d 707.) No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, BURKE, BERGAN and KEATING. Judges VAN VOORHIS and SCILEPPI dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.


Summaries of

Matter of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 29, 1966
220 N.E.2d 810 (N.Y. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARY FRAGALE, Respondent, v. ARMORY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 29, 1966

Citations

220 N.E.2d 810 (N.Y. 1966)
220 N.E.2d 810
274 N.Y.S.2d 168

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Ordinarily, a court may not comment upon a defendant's failure to testify or otherwise to come forward with…

Matter of Ward v. Typhoon Air Conditioning Co.

It does not suggest it was any more controlling than the intervention of the police or other events which…