From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Estate of Bustamante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1998
256 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 16, 1998

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable out of the estate.

The appellants, the administrators of the subject estate, seek to vacate a lien and dismiss as time-barred a claim filed against the estate by the respondent, County of Nassau, pursuant to Social Services Law § 104 (1). We now affirm the order denying that relief.

The decedent died in 1986. For reasons not clear from the record, letters of administration were not issued until May 1996. In August 1996 the County, alleging that the decedent owned real and/or personal property at the time of her death, filed a claim with the decedent's estate pursuant to Social Services Law § 104. The County sought to recover public assistance paid to the decedent from March 1977 through December 1982 in the amount of $23,165.05.

Where, as here, a recipient of public assistance benefits owns real or personal property at the time of his or her death, Social Services Law § 104 permits the County to seek recovery of benefits paid to the decedent within 10 years of death on a theory of implied contract ( see, Matter of Colon, 83 Misc.2d 344; Matter of Holmes, 77 Misc.2d 382; Matter of Cudahy, 49 Misc.2d 668; cf., Hoke v. Ortiz, 83 N.Y.2d 323, cert denied 513 U.S. 865). The relevant six-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 213) runs from the date of appointment of a fiduciary for the estate ( see, Matter of Holmes, supra; Matter of Alton, 55 Misc.2d 985; Matter of Cudahy, supra; cf., Glamm v. Allen, 57 N.Y.2d 87). Thus, the County's claim in this case was timely.

Contrary to the appellants' assertions, our decision in Matter of Kappen v. D'Elia ( 197 A.D.2d 575) is not to the contrary. In Kappen, unlike this case, the County was seeking to recover benefits paid to a decedent more than 10 years prior to the death.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Estate of Bustamante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1998
256 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Estate of Bustamante

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF the ESTATE of LORRAINE BUSTAMANTE, Deceased. CHRISTOPHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 102

Citing Cases

Robert Christopher v. Tomeck

usal to pay for her spouse's care, then such claims are time-barred because the implied contract arose when…

Heath v. Wojtowicz

Pursuant to section 104(1) of the Social Services Law, HRA may recover public assistant benefits paid to a…