October 17, 1994
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Family Court could properly infer from the appellant's unexplained and unauthorized presence inside the complainant's apartment and from his actions when confronted by the complainant that the appellant possessed the requisite criminal intent at the time of his unlawful entry into the apartment (see, People v. Mackey, 49 N.Y.2d 274; People v. Nuhibian, 201 A.D.2d 962; People v. McCrea, 194 A.D.2d 742). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the fact-finding order is not against the weight of the evidence. Sullivan, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Florio, JJ., concur.