From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Dairymen's League Cooperative Assn v. Murtagh

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 19, 1949
299 N.Y. 634 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Argued February 24, 1949

Decided May 19, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, COHALAN, J.

Theodore Kiendl, Seward A. Miller and Spencer Byard for appellant.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( Charles F. Preusse, W. Bernard Richland, Bernard Friedlander and Barbara Carroll of counsel), for respondent.

Laurence Arnold Tanzer for Commerce and Industry Association of New York, Inc., amicus curiae, in support of appellant's position.


We agree with the Appellate Division that in this investigation directed by the Mayor, the commissioner of investigation was authorized to subpoena the records and information herein sought from the appellant (New York City Charter, § 803, subd. 1). We also agree that the information sought by the subpoena duces tecum was relevant to the inquiry ( Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp., 256 N.Y. 374). We pass upon no other question. The order should be affirmed, with costs.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Dairymen's League Cooperative Assn v. Murtagh

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 19, 1949
299 N.Y. 634 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

Matter of Dairymen's League Cooperative Assn v. Murtagh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAIRYMEN'S LEAGUE COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 19, 1949

Citations

299 N.Y. 634 (N.Y. 1949)
86 N.E.2d 509

Citing Cases

In re New York State Supreme Ct. Officers Assn

"when an administrative agency has been granted subpoena power by separate statutory authority, its powers in…

Rivera-Mejia v. Schwartz

Accordingly, an application to quash a nonparty subpoena"should be granted '[o]nly where the futility of the…