Martin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

1 Citing brief

  1. Davis v. The Mostyn Law Firm PC

    MOTION for Sanctions

    Filed January 11, 2012

    Case 4:11-cv-02874 Document 27 Filed in TXSD on 01/11/12 Page 15 of 19 - 13- Id. at * 7; see also Vargas, 901 F. Supp. at 1581 (dismissing suit where plaintiff in sexual harassment lawsuit fabricated evidence); Martin, 251 F.3d at 695 (affirming dismissal with prejudice where plaintiff “gave perjurious answers during her deposition and in her interrogatory responses” and the district court “found that dismissal was the only sanction that would effectively punish [plaintiff] . . . and protect the integrity of the proceeding”). Like the plaintiff in Brown, Alvarado has made contradictory statements under oath regarding matters of significance to this case, including his job duties to substantiate that he was misclassified and the existence of others who were allegedly unlawfully denied overtime to justify certifying a class action.