Martin v. County of San Diego

2 Citing briefs

  1. Yassir Fazaga et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

    MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION to Dismiss Case Amended Complaint and for Summary Judgment 55

    Filed December 23, 2011

    See Gov’t Br. 31-32 (citing Martin v. County of San Diego, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1094, 1108 (S.D. Cal. 2009) (noting that § 52.1(j) “explicitly provides that violence is a required element . . . where the [claim] is based purely upon a defendant’s statement” (emphasis added)); Doe By and Through Doe v. Petaluma City Sch.

  2. Flynn v. Sony Electronics, Inc. et al

    REPLY in Support re MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 59 Order, MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 59 Order, Set Hearings

    Filed May 9, 2011

    Sony also complains Mr. Flynn was aware of his “financial situation” in January 2011, and such information should have been included in his opposition to the order to show cause. The correct standard here under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60 is reconsideration may be based upon “any … reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Martin v. County of San Diego, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1094, Case 3:09-cv-02109-AJB -RBB Document 69 Filed 05/09/11 Page 4 of 6 ______________________________________________________________________________ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 09-cv-2109 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1111 (S.D. Cal. 2009). Contrary to Sony’s opposition, application for reconsideration may include new or different facts which “were not shown” upon the prior application.