From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marks v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1113 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1113 LKK PAN P.

September 28, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 25, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 25, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243; Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.


Summaries of

Marks v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1113 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Marks v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS, Petitioner, v. NEIL CLARK, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1113 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2006)