From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America

U.S.
Oct 19, 1964
379 U.S. 17 (1964)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 327.

Decided October 19, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 414 Pa. 294, 200 A.2d 306.

Harry Alan Sherman for appellant.

David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker, Michael H. Gottesman and Ernest G. Nassar for appellees.


The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.


Summaries of

Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America

U.S.
Oct 19, 1964
379 U.S. 17 (1964)
Case details for

Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America

Case Details

Full title:MAMULA v . UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 19, 1964

Citations

379 U.S. 17 (1964)

Citing Cases

Axelrod v. Stoltz

The only issue here is whether, assuming the suspension was valid, the defendants are now improperly…