From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Magill v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 28, 1981
651 F.2d 1233 (6th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

Nos. 79-1306, 79-1307.

April 28, 1981.

D. Alden Newland, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.

M. Carr Ferguson, Wm. S. Estabrook, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ronald A. Dweck, Tax Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Stuart E. Seigel, Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C., Lester Stein, Philip Brennan, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Also David E. Carmack.

Before WEICK and BROWN, Circuit Judges and NEWBLATT, U.S. District Judge.

The Honorable Stewart A. Newblatt, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.


ORDER


Upon consideration of the briefs, record and arguments of counsel in these consolidated appeals, we are of the opinion that the findings of fact of the Tax Court are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous and that its conclusions of law are correct.

It is therefore ordered that the decisions of the Tax Court in each appeal be and it is hereby affirmed. 70 T.C. 465.


Summaries of

Magill v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 28, 1981
651 F.2d 1233 (6th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

Magill v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM AND JOYCE MAGILL, APPELLANT, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 28, 1981

Citations

651 F.2d 1233 (6th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

Woodsum v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

As we explain below, what is required for “reasonable cause” is that the taxpayer conduct a review the…

Woodsum v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

As we explain below, what is required for "reasonable cause" is that the taxpayer conduct a review the…