From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Madison-68 Corp. v. Malpass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 11, 2009
884 N.Y.S.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 914.

August 11, 2009.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered April 11, 2008, after a nonjury trial, awarding plaintiff the sum of $15,500 with interest from July 1, 2004, costs and disbursements, and which brings up for review an order of the same court and J.H.O., entered March 17, 2008, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the trial and restore the case to the trial calendar, and granted defendants' counterclaim for attorneys' fees, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent that the award of attorneys' fees to defendants is vacated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Belkin Burden Wenig Goldman, LLP, New York (Edward Baer of counsel), for appellant.

Tarter Krinsky Drogin LLP, New York (Debra Bodian Bernstein of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


Plaintiff's objection, made under the best evidence rule, to the admission of the lease rider was properly overruled because it had offered into evidence a copy of the same document. The J.H.O. at times cut off questioning, but did so in an evenhanded manner to expedite the trial, never amounting to prejudicial error ( see Lewis v Port Auth. of N.Y. N.J., 8 AD3d 205, 206). Nor was the judgment against the weight of the evidence, since the case essentially turned on the parties' competing oral testimony. The issue of the prevailing party notwithstanding, it was error for the J.H.O. to determine that defendants were entitled to an award of attorneys' fees. In Oxford Towers Co., LLC v Wagner ( 58 AD3d 422), this Court held that an identical lease provision was not covered by Real Property Law § 234.


Summaries of

Madison-68 Corp. v. Malpass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 11, 2009
884 N.Y.S.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Madison-68 Corp. v. Malpass

Case Details

Full title:MADISON-68 CORP., Appellant, v. DAVID MALPASS et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 11, 2009

Citations

884 N.Y.S.2d 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
65 A.D.3d 445
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6154

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Dominic Casamento v. Juaregui

“After prevailing in this holdover summary proceeding, tenant sought an award of attorney's fees based on…

Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Taylor

Here, the landlord makes no attempt to distinguish Bunny Realty and Casamento. Instead, the landlord contends…