Macken
v.
Spokane Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTONJan 18, 2013
NO. CV-11-400-JPH (E.D. Wash. Jan. 18, 2013)

NO. CV-11-400-JPH

01-18-2013

LAWRENCE E. MACKEN, Plaintiff, v. SPOKANE COUNTY (MUNICIPAL JAIL), JOHN McGRATH, LIEUTENANT TYLER, SERGEANT PURCELL, and SCOTT BAUM, Defendants.


ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS

TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

AND TO EXPEDITE

BEFORE THE COURT is plaintiff's motion to alter or amend judgment. ECF No. 95. On January 16, 2013, the Court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. ECF No. 93.

Plaintiff asks the Court to alter or amend its judgment denying "Plaintiff's Motion to Preclude Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment," ECF No. 88, because the pleading was "meant to be defined and understood as Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment." ECF No. 95 at 2.

The Court denied plaintiff's motion to preclude but treated the pleadings as they were intended, that is, as plaintiff's response to defendants' summary judgment motion. See ECF No. 93.

The Court has considered the motion and reviewed the record. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to expedite, ECF No. 96, is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend judgment, ECF No. 95, is DENIED as meritless.

________


JAMES P. HUTTON


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE