Lux v. Rodrigues

1 Citing brief

  1. SONIC-CALABASAS A, INC. v. MORENO

    Appellant’s Supplemental Reply Brief

    Filed March 27, 2012

    (See e.g. Discover Bank v. Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148) and Gentry v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443) [both applying state public policy to avoid arbitration].) But after the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion ((2011) 563 U.S. __, 131 S.Ct. 5 1740) and then vacated this Court’s prior opinion in this matter, Moreno’s arguments were no longer viable. But Moreno’s counsel argues in their Initial Brief Following Remand From the United States Supreme Court as though the United States Supreme Court has notsettled the issue.