From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Rimar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Dec 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2491 (W.D. La. Dec. 9, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2491

12-09-2014

LUV N' CARE, LTD v. GROUPO RIMAR, AKA SUAVINEX


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 11] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) [Doc. No. 5], filed by defendant Groupo Rimar, AKA Suavinex, SA is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's prior service attempt, reflected in [Doc. No. 4] is QUASHED. Plaintiff shall proceed to serve defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 9th day of December, 2014.

/s/_________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Rimar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Dec 9, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2491 (W.D. La. Dec. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Rimar

Case Details

Full title:LUV N' CARE, LTD v. GROUPO RIMAR, AKA SUAVINEX

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 9, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2491 (W.D. La. Dec. 9, 2014)

Citing Cases

Jones v. McClean

However, dismissal under Rule 12(b)(5) is inappropriate when there is a reasonable likelihood that a…

In re Prosper Operators, Inc.

Rule 12(b)(5) allows for dismissal of an action based on insufficient service of process. Luv N' Care, Ltd.…