From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lumantes v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 13, 1956
232 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1956)


No. 14826.

March 13, 1956.

Jackson Hertogs, Joseph Hertogs, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Lloyd H. Burke, U.S. Atty., James B. Schnake, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before McALLISTER and LEMMON, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1451, revoking the naturalization of appellant.

It is conceded that appellant falsely misrepresented his marital status throughout the naturalization proceedings, but appellant denies that the misrepresentation was "willful" within the meaning of the statute.

After hearing appellant testify, viewing his demeanor and manner, and judging his credibility in the light of all the evidence, the trial court found inter alia that appellant "wilfully misrepresented his marital status with knowledge of the falsity and intent to deceive the Government." Fed.R.Civ.Proc. rule 52(a), 28 U.S.C.A.; Knauer v. United States, 1946, 328 U.S. 654, 660, 66 S.Ct. 1304, 90 L.Ed. 1500.

Upon oral argument appellant stated in effect that the sole question presented on appeal is whether the evidence in support of the finding as to appellant's state of mind is "`clear, unequivocal, and convincing.'" Id., 328 U.S. at page 657, 66 S.Ct. at page 1037.

We find no rational ground for differing with the trial court on the issue as to appellant's intent and, for reasons concisely stated in the opinion written by the learned District Judge, United States v. Lumantes, D.C.N.D.Cal. 1955, 139 F. Supp. 574, the judgment is affirmed.

Summaries of

Lumantes v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 13, 1956
232 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1956)
Case details for

Lumantes v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Amando Sulimenario LUMANTES, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 13, 1956


232 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

United States v. D'Agostino

D'Agostino advisedly raises no issue with respect to the materiality of marital status in an application for…

United States v. Chandler

However, it is not necessary to rule in this case that he would certainly have been found ineligible; the…