From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucy v. Adams

U.S.
Oct 10, 1955
350 U.S. 1 (1955)

Summary

In Lucy v. Adams, 1955, 350 U.S. 1, 76 S.Ct. 33, 100 L.Ed. 3, the Supreme Court vacated a stay granted by a District Court of its order directing the admission of the first two Negroes to the University of Alabama pending appeal to the Fifth Circuit. The court there held that where the rights are personal and present and where the stay issue is co-extensive with that on the merits, the stay should be denied.

Summary of this case from Meredith v. Fair

Opinion

APPLICATION TO VACATE ORDER GRANTING STAY OF INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL AND TO REINSTATE INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL.

No. 294, Misc.

Decided October 10, 1955.

The injunction which the District Court issued in this case, but suspended pending appeal to the Court of Appeals, is reinstated to the extent that it enjoins and restrains the respondent and others designated from denying these petitioners, solely on account of their race or color, the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study there.

134 F. Supp. 235, injunction reinstated in part.

Arthur D. Shores, Constance Baker Motley, Robert L. Carter and Thurgood Marshall for petitioners.

Frontis H. Moore for respondent.


Petitioners, Autherine J. Lucy and Polly Anne Myers, citizens of Alabama, have been seeking admission to the University of Alabama since September 1952. Respondent William F. Adams is Dean of Admissions of the University. After hearings, United States District Judge Grooms of the Northern District of Alabama found that petitioners had been denied admission to the University "solely on account of their race and color." Holding this denied petitioners equal protection of state laws, the court permanently enjoined respondent Adams, his agents, employees and others acting in concert with respondent "from denying the plaintiffs and others similarly situated the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study thereat, solely on account of their race or color." 134 F. Supp. 235. Respondent's motion to suspend the injunction pending appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was granted by the District Judge. A judge of that court denied a motion to vacate the suspension and reinstate the injunction. A similar motion is now before us.

The motion is granted and the injunction is reinstated to the extent that it enjoins and restrains the respondent and others designated from denying these petitioners, Autherine Lucy and Polly Anne Myers, the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study there. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 332 U.S. 631; Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629; McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U.S. 637. In other respects, the motion is denied.


Summaries of

Lucy v. Adams

U.S.
Oct 10, 1955
350 U.S. 1 (1955)

In Lucy v. Adams, 1955, 350 U.S. 1, 76 S.Ct. 33, 100 L.Ed. 3, the Supreme Court vacated a stay granted by a District Court of its order directing the admission of the first two Negroes to the University of Alabama pending appeal to the Fifth Circuit. The court there held that where the rights are personal and present and where the stay issue is co-extensive with that on the merits, the stay should be denied.

Summary of this case from Meredith v. Fair

In Lucy v. Adams, 1955, 350 U.S. 1, 76 S.Ct. 33, 100 L.Ed. 3, the Supreme Court indicated, as we have never doubted, that individual plaintiffs in a class suit such as those at bar, have a personal right to immediate enforcement of their claims if such be feasible.

Summary of this case from Evans v. Ennis
Case details for

Lucy v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:LUCY ET AL. v . ADAMS, DEAN OF ADMISSIONS, UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 10, 1955

Citations

350 U.S. 1 (1955)
76 S. Ct. 33

Citing Cases

Reed v. Hollywood Professional School

         In the court's opinion a private school is not a place of public accommodation or amusement, nor is…

Weinman v. City of Pueblo (In re Adam Aircraft Indus., Inc.)

The Bankruptcy Court did not analyze whether and to what extent the evidence showed that particular…