From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. Pierce

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Oct 2, 1946
76 Cal.App.2d 316 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946)


Docket No. 15512.

October 2, 1946.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Elmer D. Doyle, Judge pro tem. Reversed.

Walter Gould Lincoln for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondents.

This action was brought by plaintiffs to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by them resulting from having been struck by an automobile driven by defendant. In his answer to the complaint defendant pleaded affirmatively that the accident was proximately caused by the negligence of plaintiffs. From a judgment in their favor defendant appeals.

[1] The only point necessary to be considered is the failure of the court to make a finding on said special defense. There is evidence in the record which, if believed by the trial judge, would support a finding of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiffs. The plea of that defense in a personal injury action, with evidence tending to support it, presents an issue upon which the court is required to make a finding, and its failure so to do is reversible error. ( Linde v. Emmick, 16 Cal.App.2d 676, 682 [ 61 P.2d 338]; Hall v. Kaufman, 30 Cal.App.2d 283, 285 [ 86 P.2d 151]; Tucker v. United Railroads, 171 Cal. 702, 704 [ 154 P. 835]; Maxwell v. Western Auto Stage Co., Inc., 46 Cal.App. 548, 550 [ 189 P. 710]; Huntington v. Vavra, 36 Cal.App. 352, 354 [ 172 P. 166]; Blaylock v. Jensen, 44 Cal.App.2d 850, 852 [ 113 P.2d 256]; Woodworth v. Morgan, 4 Cal.App.2d 488, 490 [ 41 P.2d 186].)

Appellant has tendered this as one of the grounds for reversal of the judgment but has not provided us with any authorities relating to the question. Respondent has presented neither brief nor oral argument.

The court having failed to find upon the issue of contributory negligence, the judgment must be and it is reversed.

Moore, P.J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Summaries of

Lowe v. Pierce

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Oct 2, 1946
76 Cal.App.2d 316 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946)
Case details for

Lowe v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:EMMA M. LOWE et al., Respondents, v. C.H. PIERCE, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Oct 2, 1946


76 Cal.App.2d 316 (Cal. Ct. App. 1946)
172 P.2d 936

Citing Cases

Hicks v. Barnes

Both of the answers filed by the defendants contained an allegation that plaintiff was herself careless and…

Chacon v. Austin

Under facts strikingly similar to those of the present case it was held that the question of contributory…