Lopezv.Young

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth CircuitJul 30, 2007
235 Fed. Appx. 92 (4th Cir. 2007)

No. 07-6370.

Submitted: July 24, 2007.

Decided: July 30, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cv-00876-jct).

Jose Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Dana L. Gay, Noelle Leigh Shaw-Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Edward Joseph McNelis, III, John David McChesney, Rawls McNelis, PC, Richmond, Virginia; George W. Wooten, Wootenhart, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia; Peter Duane Vieth, Crandall Katt, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Jose Lopez appeals the district court's order denying his "motion for review based on grounds of newly discovered evidence and information discovered after judgment." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lopez v. Young, No. 7:01-rv-00876-jct (W.D.Va. Feb. 27, 2007). We also deny Lopez' motion to lift stay and for leave to file a consolidated appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.