From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liberman v. Commercial Nat. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 15, 1971
256 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Summary

holding that personal service was perfected on defendant where deputy sheriff observed the defendant retrieve papers left in his mail box after attempting to avoid service by running away from process server into his home but noting that "this approaches outer limits"

Summary of this case from Coffin v. Brandau

Opinion

No. 71-704.

December 15, 1971.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County, C. Lavon Ward, J.

Daniel I. Wincor, North Bay Village, for appellants.

Kenneth G. Stevens, of Dale Stevens, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


By interlocutory appeal appellants seek review of an order denying their motion to quash service of process upon them.

Evidence was presented from which the trial court could find that Mr. Liberman sought to avoid service of process by the expedient of running into his house and closing the door upon seeing the process server approach, somewhat similar to the conduct of Mr. Haney in the case of Haney v. Olin Corp., Fla.App. 1971, 245 So.2d 671. The process server (a deputy sheriff) testified that, being thus frustrated by Mr. Liberman's conduct, he then left the copy of process and suit papers in the mail box, drove his car around the block and parked where he could observe the Liberman residence. Shortly thereafter, he observed Mr. Liberman come out of the house, go to the mail box, remove the papers therefrom, and return to the house.

While this approaches outer limits, we conclude on the basis of our decision in the Haney case, supra, that personal service on Mr. Liberman was perfected under F.S. section 48.031, F.S.A. Obviously, there was no personal service on his wife, appellant Leatrice Liberman, and the facts which we have related would not support substituted service upon her. Olin Corp. v. Haney, Fla.App. 1971, 245 So.2d 669.

The order is affirmed as to appellant Haskell M. Liberman, and reversed as to appellant Leatrice Liberman.

REED, C.J., and CROSS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Liberman v. Commercial Nat. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 15, 1971
256 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

holding that personal service was perfected on defendant where deputy sheriff observed the defendant retrieve papers left in his mail box after attempting to avoid service by running away from process server into his home but noting that "this approaches outer limits"

Summary of this case from Coffin v. Brandau

upholding a finding that service was proper where the person to be served "sought to avoid service of process by the expedient of running into his house and closing the door upon seeing the process server approach," and the process server left the process papers in the person's mailbox and stayed to watch him bring them into his house

Summary of this case from U.S. S.E.C. v. Reinhard

In Liberman v. Commercial National Bank of Broward County, 256 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971), Liberman ran into his house and closed the door after seeing the process server, a deputy sheriff.

Summary of this case from Henzel v. Noel
Case details for

Liberman v. Commercial Nat. Bank

Case Details

Full title:HASKELL M. LIBERMAN AND LEATRICE LIBERMAN, APPELLANTS, v. COMMERCIAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 15, 1971

Citations

256 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

Coffin v. Brandau

r's identity and purpose, cannot be frustrated by the simple expedient of the person closing the front door…

Boatfloat v. Central Transport

Henzel v. Noel, 598 So.2d 220, 221 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (citing Carlini v. State Dep't of Legal Affairs, 521…