From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 17, 2011
No. 05-10-01377-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-10-01377-CR

Opinion issued August 17, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F06-64828-U.

Before Justices MORRIS, MOSELEY, and FITZGERALD.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Rashad Emanuel Lewis appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 29.02(a), 29.03(a) (West 2011). On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (court of appeals's duty is to determine whether there are any arguable issues, and, if so, to remand the case to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to address those issues). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Lewis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 17, 2011
No. 05-10-01377-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Lewis v. State

Case Details

Full title:RASHAD EMANUEL LEWIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Aug 17, 2011

Citations

No. 05-10-01377-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 17, 2011)