From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2017
No. 17-1304 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1304

06-22-2017

ROBERT LAUTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant - Appellee.

Robert Lauter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard J. Cromwell, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK) Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lauter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard J. Cromwell, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Lauter appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline, No. 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2017
No. 17-1304 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LAUTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 22, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1304 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2017)