Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't
v.
Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADASep 7, 2018
No. 74001 (Nev. Sep. 7, 2018)

No. 74001

09-07-2018

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MARK B. BAILUS, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND DAVID MICHAEL FROSTICK, Real Parties in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus challenges a district court order compelling production of a Critical Incident Review Team (CIRT) report.

Having considered the parties' arguments, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 853 (1991). In particular, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in determining that the CIRT report contained Brady material, see State v. Huebler, 128 Nev. 192, 198, 275 P.3d 91, 95-96 (2012) (reviewing de novo a district court's determination regarding a Brady claim), and petitioner conceded at oral argument that it would be required to produce the CIRT report if it contained Brady material. Accordingly, we

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

We note that the district court ordered production of a redacted copy of the CIRT report. --------

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.


Douglas /s/_________, J.
Cherry /s/_________, J.
Pickering /s/_________, J.
Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Hon. Mark B. Bailus, District Judge


Charlotte M. Matanane Bible


Marquis Aurbach Coffing


Liesl K. Freedman


Attorney General/Carson City


Gregory & Waldo, LLC


Clark County District Attorney


Eighth District Court Clerk