From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lariscey v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 3, 1993
981 F.2d 1244 (Fed. Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. 90-5129.

December 28, 1992. Rehearing Denied March 3, 1993.

John S. Moot, Washington, DC, argued, for plaintiff-appellant, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc. Also on the brief, for plaintiff-appellant were Buel White and Lewis B. Gardner.

Edward H. Rice, Dept. of Justice, argued, for defendant-appellee, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc, with him on the brief, were Stuart M. Gerson, and Vito J. DiPietro. Also on the brief, for defendant-appellee was Chun-I Chiang. Of counsel, was John Fargo.

Appealed from U.S. Claims Court; Bohdan A. Futey, Judge.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, RICH, NEWMAN, ARCHER, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Circuit Judge Schall took no part in the decision of this case.


ORDER


The judgment in the above appeal is affirmed by an equally divided court.


Summaries of

Lariscey v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 3, 1993
981 F.2d 1244 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
Case details for

Lariscey v. United States

Case Details

Full title:EARL JASON LARISCEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 1993

Citations

981 F.2d 1244 (Fed. Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hamrick

See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Williams, 963 F.2d 567 (3d Cir. 1992) (en banc); Lawrence v.…