From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lamb v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 25, 2008
290 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1725.

Submitted: August 21, 2008.

Decided: August 25, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (4:07-cv-000082-RBSTEM).

Robert Emerson Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.


Robert Emerson Lamb appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and dismissing it for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000) because it was not filed in a timely manner. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. Astnie, No. 4:07-cv-00082-RBS (E.D. Va. June 19, 2008). We deny his motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lamb v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 25, 2008
290 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Lamb v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Robert Emerson LAMB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 25, 2008

Citations

290 F. App'x 607 (4th Cir. 2008)