From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lady v. Smith

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Feb 9, 1937
19 Cal.App.2d 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)


Docket No. 11255.

February 9, 1937.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Thurmond Clarke, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

William Ellis Lady, in pro. per., for Appellant.

W. Eugene Craven for Respondent.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after a trial before a court without a jury.

[1] Appellant has failed in his opening brief to present each point separately under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented and the point to be made. (Sec. 2, rule VIII, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.)

Mr. Presiding Justice Conrey in Adams v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co., 124 Cal.App. 393 [ 12 P.2d 464], in commenting upon this provision of rule VIII, supra, accurately states the requirement thus at page 394:

"Such assignment of error should take the form of one or more stated propositions, which, if sustained, would lend reasonable support to appellant's demand for reversal of the judgment."

This court has repeatedly held that it will not assume the task of searching the record for the purpose of discovering errors not pointed out by counsel. It is the duty of counsel to comply with rule VIII, supra, in its entirety. The provisions of this section are not mere technical requirements, but are prescribed for the purpose of facilitating disposition of cases upon appeal and directing the court's attention to the specific errors of law alleged to have been committed by the trial court.

For the foregoing reason the appeal is dismissed.

Crail, P.J., and Wood, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 8, 1937.

Summaries of

Lady v. Smith

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Feb 9, 1937
19 Cal.App.2d 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
Case details for

Lady v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:W.E. LADY, Appellant, v. ISAIAH H. SMITH, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 9, 1937


19 Cal.App.2d 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
65 P.2d 76

Citing Cases

Richmond Redevelopment Agcy. v. W. Title Guaranty

It is nothing more than what amounts to a random and somewhat garbled recital of alleged grievances, without…

Opdyk v. California Horse Racing Bd.

The failure to head an argument as required by California Rules of Court, rule 15(a), constitutes a waiver. (…