From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov 10, 2011
663 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 09–15703 09–15806.

2011-11-10

Michael LACEY; Jim Larkin; Phoenix New Times, LLC, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a public entity; Joseph Arpaio, Sheriff, and Ava Arpaio, husband and wife; Dennis Wilenchik and Becky Bartness, husband and wife; John Does I–X; Jane Does I–X; Black Corporations, I–V; and White Partnerships, I–V, Defendants–Appellees.Michael Lacey; Jim Larkin; Phoenix New Times, LLC, Plaintiffs–Appellees, v. Joseph M. Arpaio, Sheriff and husband; Ava Arpaio, wife; John Does I–X; Jane Does I–X; Black Corporations, I–V; White Partnerships, I–V; Maricopa County Attorney's Office, a public entity, Defendants,andDennis Wilenchik; Becky Bartness, wife, Defendants–Appellants.

Michael Charles Manning, Leslie E. O'Hara, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Michael J. Meehan, Law Office of Michael Meehan, Tucson, AZ, Don Bennett Moon, Don Bennett Moon, P.C., Prescott, AZ, for Plaintiffs–Appellees. William R. Jones, Jr., Esquire, Eileen Dennis Gilbride, Esquire, Joseph J. Popolizio, Esquire, Jones Skelton & Hochuli, PLC, Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants–Appellees.


Michael Charles Manning, Leslie E. O'Hara, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Michael J. Meehan, Law Office of Michael Meehan, Tucson, AZ, Don Bennett Moon, Don Bennett Moon, P.C., Prescott, AZ, for Plaintiffs–Appellees. William R. Jones, Jr., Esquire, Eileen Dennis Gilbride, Esquire, Joseph J. Popolizio, Esquire, Jones Skelton & Hochuli, PLC, Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants–Appellees. Scott Harris Zwillinger, Laura Ann Freeman, Zwillinger Greek Zwillinger & Knecht PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants–Appellants.D.C. No. 2:08–cv–00997–SRB.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Silverman and Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov 10, 2011
663 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Lacey v. Maricopa Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Michael LACEY; Jim Larkin; Phoenix New Times, LLC, Plaintiffs–Appellees…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

Citations

663 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Real v. Walker

In support of their notice of appeal, defendants cite two cases authorizing an immediate interlocutory appeal…

Mountain Cascade Inc. v. City of S.F.

As the court grants San Francisco's motion to dismiss the sole federal claim over which it has original…