From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krasnov v. United States

U.S.
Oct 14, 1957
355 U.S. 5 (1957)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 238.

Decided October 14, 1957.

Together with No. 254, Comfy Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States, and No. 255, Oppenheimer v. United States, also on appeals from the same court.

143 F. Supp. 184, affirmed.

C. Brewster Rhoads for appellants in No. 238.

Robert L. Wright and Milton M. Gottesman for appellants in No. 254.

Joseph F. Padlon for appellant in No. 255.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Daniel M. Friedman and Joseph F. Tubridy for the United States.



The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


Summaries of

Krasnov v. United States

U.S.
Oct 14, 1957
355 U.S. 5 (1957)
Case details for

Krasnov v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KRASNOV ET AL. v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 14, 1957

Citations

355 U.S. 5 (1957)
78 S. Ct. 34

Citing Cases

In re Penn Cent. Commercial Paper Litig.

Consequently, defendant's argument that First Boston did not waive the privilege except for purposes of the…

U.S. v. Suarez

See United States v. Gordon-Nikkar, 518 F.2d 972, 975 (5th Cir. 1975); In re Weiss, 596 F.2d 1185 (4th Cir.…