Konsuvo v. Netzke

1 Citing brief

  1. Bustamante v. D.O. Productions, Llc et al

    REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion

    Filed December 6, 2016

    Case 2:16-cv-04618-JMV-JBC Document 79 Filed 12/06/16 Page 11 of 16 PageID: 979 8 Nevertheless, assuming arguendo that Plaintiff can show fraud or misrepresentation, which he cannot, the releases would merely be voidable. See Konsuvo v. Netzke, 91 N.J. Super. 353, 367 (Ch. Div. 1966) (“Intentional misrepresentation and concealment of material facts renders a transaction voidable at the option of the defrauded party.”); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 164 (1) (1981) (“If a party’s manifestation of assent is induced by either a fraudulent or a material misrepresentation . . . the contract is voidable by the recipient.”)