Kitilya
v.
Cal. Health Care Facility

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIANov 8, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-1047 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2018)

No. 2:18-cv-1047 JAM CKD P

11-08-2018

RAYMOND JUSTO KITILYA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE FACILITY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On September 17, 2018 plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// ///// /////

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: November 8, 2018

/s/_________


CAROLYN K. DELANEY


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
kiti1047.fta