From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinsley v. Long Island Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Summary

In Kinsley v. Railroad Co., 125 Mass. 54, the plaintiff was a passenger on the defendant railroad, and, on leaving the car for dinner, inquired of an employee in the car if his baggage would be safe if left in the car and was told to leave all his baggage in the car; that it would be perfectly safe.

Summary of this case from Hasbrouck v. N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co.

Opinion

June, 1926.


Order granting plaintiff's motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. We think the issues of negligence and contributory negligence in this case were properly decided by the jury. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kinsley v. Long Island Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

In Kinsley v. Railroad Co., 125 Mass. 54, the plaintiff was a passenger on the defendant railroad, and, on leaving the car for dinner, inquired of an employee in the car if his baggage would be safe if left in the car and was told to leave all his baggage in the car; that it would be perfectly safe.

Summary of this case from Hasbrouck v. N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co.
Case details for

Kinsley v. Long Island Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:HELEN LANE KINSLEY, Respondent, v. THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1926

Citations

217 App. Div. 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Hasbrouck v. N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co.

In Brown v. Eastern Railroad Co., 11 Cush. 97, it is held that "A notice that a railroad corporation would…