Kincaidv.Eberle

U.S.Dec 12, 1983
464 U.S. 1018 (1983)

Cases citing this document

How cited

  • Matson v. Cargill, Inc.

    Even where a prima facie case has been established but the defendant has rebutted with a proffer of…

  • Klein v. Stop-N-Go

    It was undertaken by a lawyer associated with plaintiff's counsel without expert consultation, advice, or…

219 Citing cases

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

  • holding that "a plaintiff . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact"

    Summary of this case from Grooms v. Wiregrass Electric Cooperative, Inc.

  • holding that "a plaintiff . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact

    Summary of this case from Alford v. City of Montgomery, Alabama

  • holding that "a plaintiff" . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact

    Summary of this case from Oliver v. Russell Corp.

No. 83-5465.

December 12, 1983, OCTOBER TERM, 1983.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 712 F. 2d 1023.