Kincaid
v.
Eberle

U.S. Supreme CourtDec 12, 1983
464 U.S. 1018 (1983)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Matson v. Cargill, Inc.

    …701 F.2d 1383, 1391 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018, 104 S.Ct. 549, 78 L.Ed.2d 724 (1983). If the…

  • Klein v. Stop-N-Go

    …The methodology employed to derive the basic sample calculations defied every rudimentary principle of…

lock 218 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Summaries written by judges

Summaries

  • holding that "a plaintiff . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact"

    Summary of this case from Grooms v. Wiregrass Electric Cooperative, Inc.

  • holding that "a plaintiff . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact

    Summary of this case from Alford v. City of Montgomery, Alabama

  • holding that "a plaintiff" . . . cannot rely on attenuated possibilities that a jury would infer a discriminatory motive, but rather must come forward with sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case and respond sufficiently to any rebuttal by the defendant to create a genuine issue of material fact

    Summary of this case from Oliver v. Russell Corp.

No. 83-5465.

December 12, 1983, OCTOBER TERM, 1983.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 712 F. 2d 1023.