Filed August 27, 2014
See, e.g., Cont’l Cas. Co. v. Law Offices of Melbourne Mills, Jr., PLLC, 676 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2012); Huber v. Taylor, 469 F.3d 67 (3d Cir. 2006) (suing class counsel for breach of fiduciary duty); Achtman v. Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP, 2005 WL 2277719 (2d Cir. Sept. 19, 2005); Pigford v. Veneman, 292 F.3d 918, 926 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (remedy is to sue class counsel for malpractice); Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corp., 100 F.3d 1348 (7th Cir. 1996); Durkin v. Shea & Gould, 92 F.3d 1510 (9th Cir. 1996); Diaz v. Sheppard, 85 F.3d 1502 (11th Cir. 1996); Johnson v. Nextel Commc’ns, Inc., 293 F.R.D. 660 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Hays v. Pearlman, 2010 WL 4510956 (D. S.C. Nov. 2, 2010) (denying motion to dismiss putative class plaintiffs’ professional malpractice, breach of fiduciary, and negligent misrepresentation claims); City of Dubuque v. Iowa Trust, 519 N.W.2d 786 (Iowa 1994); Janik v. Rudy, Exelrod & Zieff, 119 Cal. App. 4th 930 (Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2004); Smith v. McCleskey, Harriger, Brazill, & Graf, L.L.P., 15 S.W.3d 644 (Tex. App. 2000).