From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kalmanash v. Weinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1946
271 App. Div. 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

October 7, 1946.


Appeal by defendants from an order denying, without prejudice to a further application, their motion for a discovery and inspection, and from another order granting plaintiff's motion for an examination before trial, insofar as the latter order allowed examination upon certain items, designated "8", "9" and "11". Appeal from the order denying defendants' motion for discovery and inspection dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. ( Weinrib v. American Binder Co., 270 App. Div. 914.) Order granting plaintiff's motion for an examination before trial, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed on five days' notice. No opinion. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kalmanash v. Weinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1946
271 App. Div. 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Kalmanash v. Weinstein

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL KALMANASH, Respondent, v. FRANK WEINSTEIN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1946

Citations

271 App. Div. 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Zilavy v. Olori

May 15, 1961 In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, in which defendant served a…

Okin v. White Plains Hospital

Such a contradictory result would be to plaintiffs' prejudice (see Heimov v 15 Pleasantville Rd. Corp., 1…