From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyce v. Rumsey Realty Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1966
17 N.Y.2d 118 (N.Y. 1966)

Summary

In Joyce v Rumsey Realty Corp. (17 N.Y.2d 118, 122) Judge Desmond wrote, "That plaintiff was caused to fall by the breaking of a plank is beside the point.

Summary of this case from Hirsch v. Graeber

Opinion

Argued January 3, 1966

Decided March 24, 1966

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, PETER A. QUINN, J.

Benjamin H. Siff and Abraham Solomon for respondent-appellant. Copal Mintz and Morris Zweibel for appellant and third-party plaintiff-appellant. John Nielsen and Thomas O. Perrell for respondent.

Philip Hoffer, Raymond J. MacDonnell, Peter T. Affatato and Rose L. Hoffer for third-party defendant-respondent.


At the end of the trial there was, between plaintiff and defendant Rumsey, no unresolved issue as to liability and so a verdict was properly directed for plaintiff against Rumsey, leaving to the jury the fixation of the damages. Rumsey had unquestionably violated the unequivocal command of subdivision 1 of former section 241 of the Labor Law that the contractor must complete the flooring as the building progresses. Plaintiff was moving planks on the fourth floor. The first, second and third levels had not been floored over as required by the statute and plaintiff, standing on a plank which broke, fell through the openings into the basement. The duty imposed by the statute and violated by defendant Rumsey was "a flat and unvarying" one ( Koenig v. Patrick Constr. Corp., 298 N.Y. 313, 318) and again as we said in Koenig: "For breach of that duty, thus absolutely imposed, the wrongdoer is rendered liable without regard to his care or lack of it." Or, as we put it in Major v. Waverly Ogden ( 7 N.Y.2d 332, 334), a violation of such a statute is "conclusive evidence of negligence". Conclusive evidence of negligence calls for a directed verdict. It is, of course, undeniable that the statute is for the protection of workers situated as was plaintiff (see Bergen v. East 84th St. Constr. Corp., 16 N.Y.2d 644).

That plaintiff was caused to fall by the breaking of a plank is beside the point. No one is ever physically injured by the existence of an unguarded opening. Something must project him into the hole but that something cannot be more than a concurrent cause of the injury. The statute puts absolute and unconditional liability on the contractor and in favor of the workman who falls through the floor opening which the statute insists must be covered. To hold otherwise would be to deprive the worker of the protection afforded him by the Labor Law. To say that a jury in such a case could bring in a no cause verdict would be to say that the jury can nullify the statute.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and KEATING concur.

Order affirmed, with costs to Butler against Joyce and to Joyce and Mara against Rumsey.


Summaries of

Joyce v. Rumsey Realty Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1966
17 N.Y.2d 118 (N.Y. 1966)

In Joyce v Rumsey Realty Corp. (17 N.Y.2d 118, 122) Judge Desmond wrote, "That plaintiff was caused to fall by the breaking of a plank is beside the point.

Summary of this case from Hirsch v. Graeber

In Joyce v. Rumsey Realty Corp. (17 N.Y.2d 118), a contractor was held to be liable under subdivision 1 of former section 241 Lab. of the Labor Law. The court found the duty imposed by the statute to be "a flat and unvarying" one and "conclusive evidence of negligence" calling for a directed verdict.

Summary of this case from Horan v. Dormitory Auth

In Joyce (supra), the building had progressed above the fourth floor and no floors had been filled in. Defendant there did not dispute that the building had progressed well beyond the point at which the statute mandated the filling of the floors.

Summary of this case from Vignogna v. 170 E. 83rd Realty
Case details for

Joyce v. Rumsey Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN JOYCE, Respondent-Appellant, v. RUMSEY REALTY CORP., Appellant, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 24, 1966

Citations

17 N.Y.2d 118 (N.Y. 1966)
269 N.Y.S.2d 105
216 N.E.2d 317

Citing Cases

Zimmer v. Performing Arts

We gave early recognition to this legislative intent when we declared with respect to section 240, which was…

Vignogna v. 170 E. 83rd Realty

(L. 1932, ch. 470.) Quite obviously, if the phrase "as the building progresses" means that the first floor…