2:07-CV-1088 JCM (GWF)
Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Christopher A. Jones' motion for order. (Doc. #251). Defendants James Cox, et. al. filed a non-opposition. (Doc. #253). Plaintiff did not file a reply.
Plaintiff's motion seeks an order from the court directing the clerk to include an exhibit, attached to the motion, as exhibit 29 in his motion for summary judgment. (Doc. #251). Plaintiff asserts that he inadvertently omitted this exhibit.
In their non-opposition, defendants assert that they "consider this motion an errata and have no objection to the proposed correction to [p]laintiff's motion." (Doc. #253).
Good cause appearing, and there being no opposition,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pro se plaintiff Christopher A. Jones' motion for order (doc. #251) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall detach the exhibit from plaintiff's motion (doc. #251) and enter it separately as exhibit 29 to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, which was filed on December 16, 2011. (Doc. #244).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE