Johnson
v.
State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, AustinMar 9, 2006
No. 03-05-00559-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 9, 2006)

No. 03-05-00559-CR

Filed: March 9, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Bell County, 27th Judicial District, No. 57788, Honorable Joe Carroll, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PEMBERTON and WALDROP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Linda Pearl Johnson pleaded guilty to possessing less than one gram of cocaine. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (West 2003). The court adjudged her guilty and assessed punishment, enhanced by previous felony convictions, at twenty years' imprisonment. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.