Johnson
v.
Nevada

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADAJan 24, 2013
3:11-CV-0487-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 24, 2013)

3:11-CV-0487-HDM-VPC

01-24-2013

DAVID JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Several motions are currently pending before this court. The court will address each motion in turn. #77 Plaintiff's motion to stay briefing in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment

Plaintiff's motion to stay briefing in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment (#77) is DENIED. Defendants reserved their exhibits on plaintiff in a timely manner (#80), and plaintiff has filed an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment (#86). #79 Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time

Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time (#79) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have to and including February 8, 2013 to file a reply in support of his motion for summary judgment. #87 Plaintiff's motion to supplement exhibits for excusable neglect

Plaintiff's motion to supplement exhibits for excusable neglect (#87) is GRANTED. #88 Defendants' motion to exceed page-length limitation

Defendants' motion to exceed page-length limitation in defendants' reply in support of their motion for summary judgment (#88) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have leave to exceed the page limitation not to exceed ten additional pages. #89 Defendants' motion for enlargement of time

Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (#89) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have to and including Monday, February 4, 2013 to file a reply in support of their motion for summary judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ______


Deputy Clerk