From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jastrzebski v. North Shore School District

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1996
670 N.E.2d 1339 (N.Y. 1996)

Opinion

Decided July 2, 1996

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Harry H. Kutner, J.

Thomas J. Stock, Mineola, for appellant.

Ann K. Kandel, Hauppauge, for respondent.

Goddard, Ronan Dineen, New York City (Joseph P. Dineen of counsel), for A-1 Environmental Service, Inc., third-party defendant-respondent.

White, Quinlan, Staley Ledwith, Garden City (Peter K. Ledwith of counsel), for Kaselaan D'Angelo Associates, Inc., third-party defendant-respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 223 A.D.2d 677).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK.


Summaries of

Jastrzebski v. North Shore School District

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 2, 1996
670 N.E.2d 1339 (N.Y. 1996)
Case details for

Jastrzebski v. North Shore School District

Case Details

Full title:RYSZARD JASTRZEBSKI, Appellant, v. NORTH SHORE SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 2, 1996

Citations

670 N.E.2d 1339 (N.Y. 1996)
670 N.E.2d 1339
647 N.Y.S.2d 708

Citing Cases

Serieux v. Throop Wallabout Realty LLC

While Labor Law § 240 (1) is intended to be liberally construed, a plaintiff's right of recovery must be…

Silva v. Champ Constr. Corp.

While Labor Law § 240 (1) is intended to be liberally construed, a plaintiff's right of recovery must be…