From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Whelan Assoc., Inc.

U.S.
Jan 12, 1987
479 U.S. 1031 (1987)

Summary

stating "courts have relied upon [Rule 503] as an accurate definition of the federal common law of attorney-client privilege" and affirming order quashing subpoena for taped statements made by client at direction of a lawyer

Summary of this case from In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum

Opinion

No. 86-675.

January 12, 1987.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 797 F. 2d 1222.


Summaries of

Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Whelan Assoc., Inc.

U.S.
Jan 12, 1987
479 U.S. 1031 (1987)

stating "courts have relied upon [Rule 503] as an accurate definition of the federal common law of attorney-client privilege" and affirming order quashing subpoena for taped statements made by client at direction of a lawyer

Summary of this case from In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum

questioning the specific intent requirement but holding that a judgment n.o.v. should have been granted in any event where there was no evidence that more than one of the alleged co-conspirators had some awareness that the underlying conduct was anticompetitive or monopolistic

Summary of this case from Re/Max International v. Realty One, Inc.

explaining that abstention is the exception, and not the rule

Summary of this case from In re Carriage House Condominiums L.P.
Case details for

Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Whelan Assoc., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JASLOW DENTAL LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. v. WHELAN ASSOCIATES. INC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 12, 1987

Citations

479 U.S. 1031 (1987)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Syufy Enterprises

There is universal agreement that monopoly power is the power to exclude competition or control prices.…

Storer Cable Comms. v. Montgomery, Ala.

Similarly, in Int'l Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States, 358 U.S. 242, 249-252, 79 S.Ct. 245,…