From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 2004
6 A.D.3d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-01737.

Decided April 26, 2004.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review Resolution No. 574 of the Town Board of the Town of Riverhead dated May 21, 2002, which, inter alia, determined that the construction of a training facility for the Town of Riverhead Fire District was a "municipal building" and a permitted use, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated November 29, 2002, as granted the respondents' cross motions to dismiss the proceeding, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ciarelli Dempsey, Riverhead, N.Y. (John L. Ciarelli and Patricia A. Dempsey of counsel), for appellants.

Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Isler Yakaboski, LLP, Riverhead, N.Y. (Frank A. Isler and Phil Siegel of counsel), for respondents Robert Kozakiewicz, Edward Densieski, James Lull, Barbara Blass, and Rose Sanders.

Kuczinski, Vila Associates, P.C., Elmsford, N.Y. (Jeffrey T. Miller and C. William Yanuck of counsel), for respondent Riverhead Fire District.

Before: HOWARD MILLER, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Riverhead Fire District (hereinafter the Fire District) sought to construct a fire training facility called a "burn building" on a 13.5-acre undeveloped parcel which was zoned in an "Agriculture A" District. The Town Board of the Town of Riverhead (hereinafter the Town Board) passed Resolution No. 574 which determined that pursuant to Code of the Town of Riverhead § 108-54, the fire training facility was a "municipal building," and, therefore, a permitted land use.

The Town Board's interpretation of the Town Code is entitled to deference and should not be disturbed unless it is unreasonable or irrational ( see Matter of P.M.S. Assets v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vil. of Pleasantville, 98 N.Y.2d 683, 685; Matter of Toys "R" Us v. Silva, 89 N.Y.2d 411, 423; Town of Huntington v. Five Towns Coll. Real Prop. Trust, 293 A.D.2d 467). We find that the determination of the Town Board that the proposed training facility is a "municipal building" under Code of the Town of Riverhead § 108-54 was not unreasonable or irrational.

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

H. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 2004
6 A.D.3d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF PETER MANGLAVITI, ET AL., appellants, v. ROBERT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 545

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Manglaviti v. Kozakiewicz

Decided September 21, 2004. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 6 AD3d 716. Motion for leave to appeal…