In re Rogers

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITMay 28, 2013
No. 13-1355 (4th Cir. 2013)
No. 13-1355521 Fed. Appx. 207

No. 13-1355

05-28-2013

In re: VINCENT SHAMONT ROGERS, Petitioner.

Vincent Shamont Rogers, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:08-cr-00216-MGL-2) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent Shamont Rogers, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vincent Shamont Rogers petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for a new trial. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED