In re Professional Success Seminars Intern., Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. FloridaFeb 5, 1982
18 B.R. 75 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • In re Southwest Equipment Rental

    152 B.R. 207 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1992)

    …However, the bankruptcy court in one district has also applied the rule that a creditor cannot obtain…

  • In re John Hicks Chrysler-Plymouth

    152 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1992)

    …den., Talley v. Fox Films Corp., 301 U.S. 710, 57 S.Ct. 944, 81 L.Ed. 1363 (1937), reh. den., 302 U.S. 772,…

lock 7 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Summaries written by judges


  • applying minimum contacts with the United States as a whole in a bankruptcy…

    Summary of this case from In re Bozel S.A

Bankruptcy No. 81-02095-BKC-TCB.

February 5, 1982.

Gary Zwickel, Lake Worth, Fla., for debtor.

Robert S. Levy, West Palm Beach, Fla., for Gordon Associates.


Gordon Associates, a creditor in this bankruptcy proceeding, has filed a motion to dismiss this voluntary chapter 7 petition. (C.P. No. 7). The debtor opposes the motion on the ground that the creditor has no standing to challenge the corporation's bankruptcy petition. (C.P. Nos. 16, 17, 18). The matter was heard on February 2.

The debtor, a corporation, filed its petition on December 17. The commencement of a voluntary case constitutes an order for relief. 11 U.S.C. § 301.

The grounds for dismissal challenge the form and verification of the petition, the authority of Donald Campagna to sign the petition on behalf of the corporation, and the lack of corporate authorization for the filing. The creditor challenges the substance of the petition and the court's jurisdiction over the corporate debtor by relying on the ground of lack of authorization.

Creditors may not move to vacate a voluntary order for relief because of some irregularity in the meeting authorizing the filing of the petition, or on the ground that it was not authorized by the stockholders or corporate directors. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy (15th ed.) ¶ 301.20[3] n. 18.

The Fifth Circuit precedent, which of course I follow, is clear that a creditor lacks standing to oppose an adjudication. The creditor lacks standing whether the grounds assert lack of jurisdiction or irregularity in the substance and procedure of adjudication. In re Jack Kardow Plumbing Co., 5 Cir. 1971, 451 F.2d 123, 129.

Accordingly, the creditor lacks standing to move for dismissal of this bankruptcy petition. The motion is denied with prejudice.