From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

April 11, 2008.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 273 AD2d 600).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 11, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Patel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 1311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3290
854 N.Y.S.2d 679