From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kavanaugh

Supreme Court of California
Mar 28, 1919
179 P. 533 (Cal. 1919)

Opinion

Crim. No. 2241.

March 28, 1919.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the Supreme Court. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Geo. D. Collins, Jr., for Petitioner.


The information in the superior court upon which the judgment against petitioner is based clearly attempted to charge the felony defined by section 476a of the Penal Code. Whether the specific facts alleged as constituting the particular offense failed to sufficiently show the public offense attempted to be charged is a question which cannot be considered on habeas corpus under the well-settled rule of this jurisdiction. ( Matter of Ruef, 150 Cal. 665, [ 89 P. 605]; see, also, Ex parte Greenall, 153 Cal. 770, [ 96 P. 804].)

As to the second point, in view of the facts and exhibits shown by the petition, it must be held that the superior court did vacate the order suspending the execution of the judgment.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus was denied for these reasons.

Shaw, J., Wilbur, J., Lennon, J., Olney, J., Lawlor, J., Melvin, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.


Summaries of

In re Kavanaugh

Supreme Court of California
Mar 28, 1919
179 P. 533 (Cal. 1919)
Case details for

In re Kavanaugh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Petition of MAE KAVANAUGH for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 28, 1919

Citations

179 P. 533 (Cal. 1919)
179 P. 533

Citing Cases

In re Bramble

( In re Basuino (1943), 22 Cal.2d 247, 251 [ 138 P.2d 297].) We have before us no question such as would…

In re Wilson

(1) As to the sufficiency of the information, we quote from 13 Cal. Jur., page 232, section 14: "The scope of…