From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re J.A.M.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 8, 2017
369 N.C. 750 (N.C. 2017)

Opinion

No. 7PA17

06-08-2017

In the MATTER OF: J.A.M.

Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Johnson, Jasmine. Christopher C. Peace, Attorney at Law, Keith S. Smith, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Mecklenburg County DSS. Caroline P. Mackie, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for GAL. Jacob E. Setzer, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Moses, Travis.


Richard Croutharmel, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for Johnson, Jasmine.

Christopher C. Peace, Attorney at Law, Keith S. Smith, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Mecklenburg County DSS.

Caroline P. Mackie, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, for GAL.

Jacob E. Setzer, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Moses, Travis.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th of January 2017 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).


Summaries of

In re J.A.M.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 8, 2017
369 N.C. 750 (N.C. 2017)
Case details for

In re J.A.M.

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF: J.A.M.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Jun 8, 2017

Citations

369 N.C. 750 (N.C. 2017)
799 S.E.2d 617
799 S.E.2d 619

Citing Cases

In re J.A.M.

YFS filed a petition for discretionary review with this Court, which we allowed on 8 June 2017. See In re…

In re F.S.

These facts do not depict a continuing pattern of conduct by Respondent. See, e.g., In re Stumbo, 357 N.C.…