From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2017
No. 17-1331 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1331

06-22-2017

In re: ANTOINE HILL, Petitioner.

Antoine Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:07-cr-00407-REP-DJN-1) Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antoine Hill, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antoine Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court's docket establishes that Hill's action is proceeding and reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Hill's application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Hill

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2017
No. 17-1331 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2017)
Case details for

In re Hill

Case Details

Full title:In re: ANTOINE HILL, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 22, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1331 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2017)