From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hicks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2013
530 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1269

06-25-2013

In re: CLARENCE HICKS, Petitioner.

Clarence Hicks, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

(1:98-cr-00259-ELH-9)

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Hicks, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence Hicks petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his two motions filed in connection with his criminal conviction and sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court denied both motions by order entered April 19, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Hicks' case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Hicks

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2013
530 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Hicks

Case Details

Full title:In re: CLARENCE HICKS, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 25, 2013

Citations

530 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2013)