From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dysean R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2016
137 A.D.3d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-22-2016

In re DYSEAN R., A Person Alleged to Be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.

Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Syosset (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan Paulson of counsel), for presentment agency.


Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Syosset (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan Paulson of counsel), for presentment agency.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about March 6, 2015, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The disposition was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant's needs and the community's need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 N.Y.2d 947, 479 N.Y.S.2d 190, 468 N.E.2d 28 [1984] ). The delinquency adjudication was based on appellant's firing a handgun in a store while using a store employee as a shield during an altercation with other youths. Appellant had a prior record of delinquency that included, among other things, another adjudication arising from his firing shots at other persons, as well as violation of probation. Other factors included appellant's gang activity, and his bad behavior while in custody.

The court properly exercised its discretion when, at the dispositional hearing, it qualified a police officer as an expert in identifying and interpreting gang activity through the use of social media, because the officer's training and experience provided a sufficient foundation (see People v. Siu Wah Tse, 91 A.D.2d 350, 353, 458 N.Y.S.2d 589 [1st Dept1983], lv. denied 59 N.Y.2d 679, 463 N.Y.S.2d 1039, 450 N.E.2d 263 [1983] ). In any event, the expert testimony was only one of many factors that led to the disposition.

SWEENY, J.P., RENWICK, MOSKOWITZ, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Dysean R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2016
137 A.D.3d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Dysean R.

Case Details

Full title:In re DYSEAN R., A Person Alleged to Be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 604 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
137 A.D.3d 604
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2029

Citing Cases

People v. Pinkston

Expert testimony on gang activity did not exceed the limitations outlined in People v Inoa (25 NY3d 466…